New Era in the Management of Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma: a 3-Year Observational Follow-Up Study

Main Article Content

Ivan Triana
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8349-5576
Isabel Hernández-Linares
Angela Aguirre
Jairo Hildebrando Roa
Olga Milena García
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9921-883X
Javier Mauricio Segovia
Erick Cantor
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0920-219X
Andrés Felipe Bejarano-Ramirez
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5344-9246
Henry Vargas
Luis Eduardo Pino
Luis Gerardo García Herreros

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is frequently diagnosed in advanced stages and is currently the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial to optimize diagnosis, treatment and improve patient survival.


Methods: A retrospective cohort analytical study over two time periods, including patients over 18 years old with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma treated at a high-complexity oncology center in Colombia. The exposure group (2021-2023) received multidisciplinary care, while the non-exposure group (2018-2020) was managed conventionally by individual specialists. The study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and treatment times between both groups. Statistical analysis was based on the distribution of variables.


Results: A total of 34 patients were included. The multidisciplinary approach enabled earlier diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma, increasing early-stage identification from 30% to 61% between 2018 and 2022. Additionally, the multidisciplinary group had a higher proportion of asymptomatic cases (54% vs. 32%) and a lower relapse rate (7% vs. 52%) compared to conventional management. Treatment initiation times were significantly reduced from 3.2 to 2.2 months (p < 0.05), and the time from pathology to treatment decreased to 30 days in the multidisciplinary group versus 85 days in the conventional group.


Conclusions: The multidisciplinary approach reduced waiting times for the initiation of cancer treatment, increased treatment adherence and improved clinical outcomes.

Article Details

Section

Artículos Originales

How to Cite

New Era in the Management of Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma: a 3-Year Observational Follow-Up Study. (2025). Respirar, 17(3), 287-296. https://doi.org/10.55720/respirar.17.3.6

References

Kuhn E, Morbini P, Cancellieri A, Damiani S, Cavazza A, Comin CE. Adenocarcinoma classification: patterns and prognosis. Pathologica 2018; 110(1):5-11.

Jones GS, Baldwin DR. Recent advances in the management of lung cancer. Clin Med (Lond) 2018;18(Suppl 2):s41-s46. Doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-2-s41.

Rudin CM, Brambilla E, Faivre-Finn C, Sage J. Small-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021; 7(1):3. Doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00235-0.

Candal-Pedreira C, Ruano-Ravina A, Calvo de Juan V et al. Analysis of Diagnostic Delay and its Impact on Lung Cancer Survival: Results From the Spanish Thoracic Tumor Registry. Arch Bronconeumol 2024; 60 (2):S38-S45. Doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2024.07.006.

Callejas Gutiérrez AM. Cáncer de pulmón, ¿cuál es la mejor estrategia para cambiar los desenlaces? Rev Colomb Cancerol 2023;27(1):76–79. Doi: https://doi.org/10.35509/01239015.964.

Haward RA. The Calman-Hine report: a personal retrospective on the UK's first comprehensive policy on cancer services. Lancet Oncol 2006;7(4):336-46. Doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70659-3.

Stone CJL, Vaid HM, Selvam R, Ashworth A, Robinson A, Digby GC. Multidisciplinary Clinics in Lung Cancer Care: A Systematic Review. Clin Lung Cancer 2018;19(4):323-330.e3. Doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.02.001.

Riedel RF, Wang X, McCormack M et al. Impact of a multidisciplinary thoracic oncology clinic on the timeliness of care. J Thorac Oncol 2006; 1(7):692-6.

Peckham J, Mott-Coles S. Interprofessional Lung Cancer Tumor Board: The Role of the Oncology Nurse Navigator in Improving Adherence to National Guidelines and Streamlining Patient Care. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2018; 22(6):656-662. Doi: 10.1188/18.CJON.656-662.

de Castro GJr, Souza FH, Lima J, Bernardi LP, Teixeira CHA, Prado GF; Grupo Brasileiro de Oncologia Torácica (GBOT). Does Multidisciplinary Team Management Improve Clinical Outcomes in NSCLC? A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. JTO Clin Res Rep 2023;4(12):100580. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100580.

Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Fallowfield L. Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol 2006;7(11):935-43. Doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70940-8.

Bisceglia I, Marinelli F, Morabito F, Neri A, Mangone L. Multidisciplinary approach in oncology: enhancing patient outcomes through collaborative care. Ann Research Oncol 2024;4(2), 3-18, 2024. Doi: 10.48286/aro.2024.86.

Hung HY, Tseng YH, Chao HS et al. Multidisciplinary team discussion results in survival benefit for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. PLoS One 2020;15(10):e0236503. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236503.

Pan CC, Kung PT, Wang YH, Chang YC, Wang ST, Tsai WC. Effects of multidisciplinary team care on the survival of patients with different stages of non-small cell lung cancer: a national cohort study. PLoS One 2015; 10(5):e0126547. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126547.

Tsai CH, Hsieh HF, Lai TW, Kung PT, Kuo WY, Tsai WC. Effect of multidisciplinary team care on the risk of recurrence in breast cancer patients: A national matched cohort study. Breast 2020; 53:68-76. Doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.07.001.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)