Utilización de soportes respiratorios no invasivos post extubación en pacientes adultos críticos: revisión narrativa SRNI post extubación en adultos críticos
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
La tasa de reintubación orotraqueal luego de la extubación se registra entre un 10 a 20%. La aplicación de soportes respiratorios no-invasivos (SRNI) posterior a la extubación como cánula nasal de alto-flujo, ventilación no invasiva (dos niveles de presión) y presión positiva continua en la vía aérea demostraron ser seguras y efectivas post extubación. El período pre-destete representa un momento crucial en el manejo de los pacientes críticos ya que el fracaso de la extubación, definido como la necesidad de reintubación dentro de los 2 a 7 días, demostró peores resultados al aumentar la mortalidad entre un 25-50%. Esta situación conlleva al requerimiento de ventilación mecánica prolongada, neumonía asociada a la ventilación mecánica y estancias prolongadas de internación. Por lo tanto, es esencial identificar a los pacientes que se beneficiarán utilizando SRNI post extubación.
Detalles del artículo
Número
Sección

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Cómo citar
Referencias
Menon N, Joffe AM, Deem S et al. Occurrence and complications of tracheal reintubation in critically ill adults. Respir Care 2012;57(10):1555–1563. Doi: 10.4187/RESPCARE.01617.
Epstein SK, Ciubotaru RL. Independent effects of etiology of failure and time to reintubation on outcome for patients failing extubation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158(2):489–493. Doi: 10.1164/AJRCCM.158.2.9711045.
Thille AW, Richard JCM, Brochard L. The decision to extubate in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187(12):1294–1302. Doi: 10.1164/RCCM.201208-1523CI.
Casey JD, Vaughan EM, Lloyd BD et al. Protocolized Postextubation Respiratory Support to Prevent Reintubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021;204(3):294–302. Doi: 10.1164/RCCM.202009-3561OC.
Nava S, Gregoretti C, Fanfulla F et al. Noninvasive ventilation to prevent respiratory failure after extubation in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 2005;33(11):2465–2470. Doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000186416.44752.72.
Ferrer M, Valencia M, Nicolas JM et al. Early noninvasive ventilation averts extubation failure in patients at risk: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173(2):164–170. Doi: 10.1164/RCCM.200505-718OC.
Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Ferguson ND et al. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for respiratory failure after extubation. N Engl J Med 2004;350(24):2452–2460. Doi: 10.1056/NEJMOA032736.
Ferrer M, Sellarés J, Valencia M et al. Non-invasive ventilation after extubation in hypercapnic patients with chronic respiratory disorders: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374(9695):1082–1088. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61038-2.
Hernández G, Vaquero C, Ortiz R et al. Benefit with preventive noninvasive ventilation in subgroups of patients at high-risk for reintubation: a post hoc analysis. J Intensive Care 2022;10(1):1–7. Doi: 10.1186/S40560-022-00635-2/TABLES/2.
Peñuelas O, Frutos-Vivar F, Fernández C et al. Characteristics and outcomes of ventilated patients according to time to liberation from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184(4):430–437. Doi: 10.1164/RCCM.201011-1887OC.
Figueroa-Casas JB. Preventive Use of Noninvasive Ventilation After Planned Extubation. Respir Care 2012;57(2):318–320. Doi: 10.4187/RESPCARE.01657.
Kacmarek RM. Noninvasive Respiratory Support for Postextubation Respiratory Failure. Respir Care 2019;64(6):658–678. Doi: 10.4187/RESPCARE.06671.
Miskovic A, Lumb AB. Postoperative pulmonary complications. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia 2017;118(3):317–334. Doi: 10.1093/BJA/AEX002.
Duggan M, Kavanagh BP. Pulmonary atelectasis: A pathogenic perioperative entity. Anesthesiology 2005;102(4). Doi: 10.1097/00000542-200504000-00021.
Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW et al. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 2017;50(2). Doi: 10.1183/13993003.02426-2016.
Chiumello D, Chevallard G, Gregoretti C. Non-invasive ventilation in postoperative patients: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2011;37(6):918–929. Doi: 10.1007/S00134-011-2210-8.
Squadrone V, Coha M, Cerutti E et al. Continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of postoperative hypoxemia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;293(5):589–595. Doi: 10.1001/JAMA.293.5.589.
Futier E, Paugam-Burtz C, Godet T et al. Effect of early postextubation high-flow nasal cannula vs conventional oxygen therapy on hypoxaemia in patients after major abdominal surgery: a French multicentre randomised controlled trial (OPERA). Intensive Care Med 2016;42(12):1888–1898. Doi: 10.1007/S00134-016-4594-Y/FIGURES/2.
Auriant I, Jallot A, Hervé P et al. Noninvasive ventilation reduces mortality in acute respiratory failure following lung resection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164(7):1231–1235. Doi: 10.1164/AJRCCM.164.7.2101089.
Jaber S, Lescot T, Futier E et al. Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation on Tracheal Reintubation Among Patients With Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Following Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2016;315(13):1345–1353. Doi: 10.1001/JAMA.2016.2706.
Antonelli M, Conti G, Bufi M et al. Noninvasive ventilation for treatment of acute respiratory failure in patients undergoing solid organ transplantation: a randomized trial. JAMA 2000;283(2):235–241. Doi: 10.1001/JAMA.283.2.235.
Parke R, McGuinness S, Dixon R et al. Open-label, phase II study of routine high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 2013;111(6):925–931. Doi: 10.1093/bja/aet262.
Corley A, Bull T, Spooner AJ et al. Direct extubation onto high-flow nasal cannulae post-cardiac surgery versus standard treatment in patients with a BMI ≥30: a randomised controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 2015;41(5):887–894. Doi: 10.1007/S00134-015-3765-6.
Stéphan F, Barrucand B, Petit P et al. High-Flow Nasal Oxygen vs Noninvasive Positive Airway Pressure in Hypoxemic Patients After Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2015;313(23):2331–2339. Doi: 10.1001/JAMA.2015.5213.
Stéphan F, Bérard L, Rézaiguia-Delclaux S et al. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy Versus Intermittent Noninvasive Ventilation in Obese Subjects after Cardiothoracic Surgery. Respir Care 2017;62(9):1193–1202. Doi: 10.4187/RESPCARE.05473.
Ricard JD, Roca O, Lemiale V et al. Use of nasal high flow oxygen during acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med 2020;46(12):2238. Doi: 10.1007/S00134-020-06228-7.
Maggiore SM, Idone FA, Vaschetto R et al. Nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation. Effects on oxygenation, comfort, and clinical outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;190(3):282–288. Doi: 10.1164/RCCM.201402-0364OC.
Hernández G, Vaquero C, González P et al. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2016;315(13):1354–1361. Doi: 10.1001/JAMA.2016.2711.
Maggiore SM, Jaber S, Grieco DL et al. High-Flow Versus VenturiMask Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Reintubation in Hypoxemic Patients after Extubation: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2022;206(12):1452–1462. Doi: 10.1164/RCCM.202201-0065OC.
Nava S, Gregoretti C, Fanfulla F et al. Noninvasive ventilation to prevent respiratory failure after extubation in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 2005;33(11):2465–2470. Doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000186416.44752.72.
Fan E, Zakhary B, Amaral A et al. Liberation from mechanical ventilation in critically Ill adults: An official ATS/ACCP clinical practice guideline. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017;14(3):441–443. Doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-993CME.
Hernández G, Vaquero C, Colinas L et al. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation and Postextubation Respiratory Failure in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2016;316(15):1565–1574. Doi: 10.1001/JAMA.2016.14194.
Oczkowski S, Ergan B, Bos L et al. ERS clinical practice guidelines: high-flow nasal cannula in acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 2022;59(4):12. Doi: 10.1183/13993003.01574-2021.
Thille AW, Muller G, Gacouin A et al. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Oxygen With Noninvasive Ventilation vs High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Alone on Reintubation Among Patients at High Risk of Extubation Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019;322(15):1465. Doi: 10.1001/JAMA.2019.14901.
Wang Q, Peng Y, Xu S et al. The efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in patients at high risk of extubation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res 2023;28(1):120. Doi: 10.1186/S40001-023-01076-9.
Hernández G, Paredes I, Moran F et al. Effect of postextubation noninvasive ventilation with active humidification vs high-flow nasal cannula on reintubation in patients at very high risk for extubation failure: a randomized trial. Intensive Care Med 2022;48(12):1751–1759. Doi: 10.1007/S00134-022-06919-3.
Huang HW, Sun XM, Shi ZH et al. Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy and Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation Rate in Adult Patients After Extubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Intensive Care Med 2018;33(11):609–623. Doi: 10.1177/0885066617705118.
Torrini F, Gendreau S, Morel J et al. Prediction of extubation outcome in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2021;25(1). Doi: 10.1186/S13054-021-03802-3.
Thille AW, Coudroy R, Nay MA et al. Beneficial Effects of Noninvasive Ventilation after Extubation in Obese or Overweight Patients: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2022;205(4):440–449. Doi: 10.1164/RCCM.202106-1452OC.
De Jong A, Bignon A, Stephan F et al. Effect of non-invasive ventilation after extubation in critically ill patients with obesity in France: a multicentre, unblinded, pragmatic randomised clinical trial. Lancet Respir Med 2023;0(0). Doi: 10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00529-x.