CASE REPORT | Respirar, 2023; 15(2): 134-139 | ISSN 2953-3414 | https://doi.org/10.55720/respirar.15.2.6

RECEIVED:

April 3, 2023

ACCEPTED:

May 8, 2023

José M. Araiza-Sánchez

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9574-7667

Pedro Y. González-Noris

https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3788-3991

Juan J. Espinoza-Espinosa

https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4144-8407

Claudia X. Robledo-Jaramillo

https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9230-789X

Esta revista está bajo una licencia de
Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional.

Hypoxia Management during One-Lung Ventilation in a Patient with Mediastinal Abscess and Mediastinitis for Open Thoracotomy. Case Report

Manejo de la hipoxia durante ventilación unipulmonar en un paciente con absceso mediastinal y mediastinitis para toracotomía abierta. Reporte de caso

José M. Araiza-Sánchez1, Pedro Y. González-Noris2,3, Juan J. Espinoza-Espinosa1, Claudia X. Robledo-Jaramillo1

1. Hospital General “Dr. Darío Fernández Fierro”, ISSSTE, Anestesiología, Ciudad de México, México

2. Hospital General del ISSSTE, Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, La Paz, México

3. Hospital General “Juan María de Salvatierra”, Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, La Paz, México.

Corresponding author:

José Manuel Araiza Sánchez, manuelmangore@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: most of the patients undergoing thoracic surgery fit in the high risk group for hypoxia, especially when deciding to use one-lung ventilation due to the V/Q mismatch; therefore, new ventilation strategies and hypoxia rescue manoeuvres have been developed. Clinical course: we present an 85-year old female with no major comorbidities scheduled for open thoracotomy and managed with one-lung ventilation. During the course of the anaesthetic management, hypoxia presents secondary to V/Q mismatch and haemorrhagic hypovolemic shock, with a positive response to hypoxia rescue manoeuvres. Conclusion: it is important to prevent as much as we can the hypoxia in a one-lung ventilation following the new ventilation strategies. Although when facing a crisis, proper hypoxia management with a modern approach should not be delayed.

Keywords: one-lung ventilation, hypoxia, mechanical ventilation, protective ventilation.

Resumen

Introducción: la mayoría de los pacientes que se someten a cirugía torácica pueden ser clasificados en el grupo de alto riesgo para hipoxia, especialmente cuando se decide por una ventilación unipulmonar, debido al desequilibrio V/Q; por lo tanto, se han desarrollado nuevas estrategias ventilatorias y maniobras de rescate para hipoxia. Curso clínico: presentamos una paciente de 85 años de edad sin comorbilidades programada para toracotomía abierta y manejada con ventilación unipulmonar. Durante el manejo anestésico, se presenta hipoxia secundaria a desequilibrio V/Q y choque hipovolémico hemorrágico, con respuesta positiva a las maniobras de rescate para hipoxia. Conclusión: es importante prevenir en la medida de lo posible la hipoxia en la ventilación unipulmonar, siguiendo las nuevas estrategias ventilatorias. Sin embargo, cuando se presenta una crisis, no debemos retrasar las maniobras de rescate de forma moderna.

Palabras clave: ventilación unipulmonar, hipoxia, ventilación mecánica, ventilación protectora.

Introduction 

Hypoxemia is one of the most common complications during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in patients undergoing thoracic surgery, due to fewer gas exchange surface, V/Q mismatch which is produced during non-dependent lung collapse and patient position during surgery.1,2 Hypoxemia is less common in patients in lateral decubitus rather than in supine position, due to the perfusion flow to the dependent lung because of gravity and hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV).

Here, we discuss a case in which risk factors for hypoxia during OLV are present, therein, protective ventilation following the newest evidence was the most adequate option. Also, we describe proper management after the onset of hypoxemia, with no latter complications.

Medical history

January 2023, an 85-year old female diagnosed with left mediastinal abscess is scheduled for open thoracotomy. As a background, she is allergic to penicillin (causing rash), no history of smoking, heart disease, cancer or any other comorbidity; history of sudden left pleural effusion in December 2022 treated with a chest tube, days of hospital stay not specified. She is discharged and weeks later she presents with fever and respiratory distress. CT shows a mediastinal mass adjacent to the lower left lung (Figures 1 y 2), mediastinal abscess and mediastinitis was suspected. Broad-spectrum antibiotic management is started and she is scheduled to the operating theatre (OT) on January 27th, 2023.

Figura 1.

Mediastinal view showing soft tissue invasion from mediastinal mass.

Figura 2.

Chest TC showing a mediastinal mass that suggests pleural effusion and mediastinal abscess

Clinical course

In the OT, initial vitals BP 121/65 mmHg, HR 66 bpm, SatO2 95% with supporting oxygen by face mask and FiO2 60%.

Videolaryngoscopy is performed, intubated with a 35 fr Robertshaw right lung tube; placing is corroborated by clinical analysis since bronchoscopy was not available at the moment, assuring the upper right lobe ventilation. Mechanical ventilation is started with PC – CMV with the following settings: Ppeak 15 cmH20, RR 12 rpm, Tinsp 1.7 s, PEEP 5 cmH20, FiO2 60%; achieving an average Vt 5 - 6 ml/kg PBW (Figure 3). Also, surgery is performed in supine position, TIVA is the preferred anaesthetic management, using propofol and fentanyl.

Figura 3.

Ventilatory settings used in OLV, protective ventilation ensured, Vt 6 mL/kg PBW, adequate hysteresis, low Ppeak and PEEP 5 cmH20 for a Caw 31.9 mL/cmH20

Caw: Airway compliance; PBW: Predicted Body Weight; Ppeak: Peak Pressure.

After 25 minutes into anaesthesia, surgeon requests left lung collapse, tracheal lumen is clipped and one-lung ventilation is started. Ventilator settings are maintained for a Vt 4 mL/kg PBW. In the first 20 minutes of surgery, average SatO2 is 93% - 96%; then SatO2 and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) start dropping to 80% and 55 mmHg respectively, due to vascular injury in the surgical field not responding to fluid management (Figure 4). Therein, hypoxia rescue manoeuvres are started: rising Ppeak to achieve a Vt 6 mL/kg PBW and rising FiO2 100% for at least 5 minutes, improving oxygenation to 92% and starting low-dose norepinephrine to improve cardiac output. After the vascular injury is repaired, surgeon is asked to pause the procedure for another 10 minutes to gradually re-expand left lung, improving oxygenation up to 98%. After a total of 20 minutes, left lung is collapsed again and FiO2 is lowered to 60% with brief periods of 100% FiO2 when SatO2 dropps below 92%, low doses of norepinephrine are maintained throughout the surgery and stop after extubation, recruitment manoeuvres (RM) are not performed.

Figura 4.

Vitals before, during and after hypoxia event.

Arterial blood gases (ABG) are requested in different times of the procedure:

first one 30 minutes after the beginning of one-lung ventilation pH 7.42, pCO2 31.4 mmHg, pO2 133 mmHg, SatO2 99%, Lac 1.0 mmol/L, HCO3 21.8 mmol/L.

Second one before extubation pH 7.35, pCO2 39 mmHg, pO2 97.3, SatO2 97%, Lac 1.8 mmol/L, HCO3 21.4 mmol/L.

A mediastinal and pleural chest tube is placed before closing, left lung is re-expanded and awake extubation is performed; no complications such as bronchospasm or lung edema presents. She is admitted to the ICU with no need for rescue re-intubation.

Discussion

Prior to the implementation of lung protective ventilation, traditional management for OLV in thoracic surgery was focused on a tidal volume of 10 mL/kg (not using predicted body weight), 100% FiO2, zero-PEEP, and avoiding RM strategy.3

Modern protective lung strategies focus on lower tidal volumes 4 – 6 mL/kg PBW (some suggest 5 – 6 ml/kg PBW), use of PEEP improving lung compliance, recruitment manoeuvers, lower FiO2 and the use of PC – CMV. These strategies have demonstrated minimizing the lung injury, causing less lung inflammation, improving lung oxygenation and lung protection.2,4,5

Predictors of OLV hypoxemia include factors related to the patient and related to the procedure; such as chronic vasodilator therapy, poor oxygenation during two-lung ventilation (TLV), supine position, vasodilator use, and excessive use of volatile anesthetics.6

Normally hypoxemia presents when there is excessive perfusion to the non-dependant lung and total V/Q mismatch high, especially during supine position. In these situations, first we have to improve oxygenation in the dependent lung by raising FiO2 and improving cardiac output which in this case was impaired due to the excessive blood loss during surgery. Therein, we should reassure blood flow to the ventilated areas, avoid using vasodilators and minimize the use of volatile anesthetics, also gradually re-expand the non-dependant lung if necessary.6

Conclusion

Protective lung ventilation has improved not only the outcomes for patients undergoing OLV, but also, have minimized the risk for hypoxemia. Facing an hypoxemia crisis, rescue manoeuvers should be started, based on improving the oxygenation and perfusion in the dependant lung, optimizing anaesthetic and fluid management.

Statements

The patient and patient’s guardian were made aware and agreed for this publication.

Funding: none.

Conflict of interest: the authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author's contributions: JMAS: proyect managemente, formal analysis, writing, review and editing, research, methodology, original draft, software; PYGN: supervision, validation; JJEE: supervision, validation; CXRJ: supervision, validation.

The Editors in Chief, Dr. Carlos Luna and Dr. Francisco Arancibia, followed the review process and accepted this article.

References

  1. Lohser J. Evidence-based management of one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiology clinics 2008;26(2): 241–v. Doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2008.01.011
  2. Loop T. One-Lung Ventilation. Anästh Intensivmed 2020; 61:579–586. Doi: 10.19224/ai2020.579
  3. Şentürk M, Slinger P, Cohen E. Intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategies for one-lung ventilation. Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology 2015;29(3): 357–369. Doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2015.08.001
  4. El Tahan MR, Pasin L, Marczin N, Landoni G. Impact of Low Tidal Volumes During One-Lung Ventilation. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2017; 31(5): 1767–1773. Doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.06.015
  5. Kim KN, Kim DW, Jeong MA, Sin YH, Lee SK. Comparison of pressure-controlled ventilation with volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC anesthesiology 2016; 16(1): 72. Doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0238-6
  6. Lohser J. Managing hypoxemia during minimally invasive thoracic surgery. Anesthesiology clinics 2012; 30(4): 683–697. Doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2012.08.006